Not one to be patient
The downside I see for the conversion is that analog TV picked up even the weakest signals and you had to adjust your antenna to filter out the cross over signals. Digital won't come in if you have conflicting signals or if the signal is not strong enough. This can be good and bad. When you have a signal you will have the best picture possible, always. But when the signal goes away or a storm moves in for instance you will have heavy pixelization and drop out or lost signal. Now I only have a cheap Samsung 30 in HDTV but I thoroughly enjoy watching the nature programs and Sunday night football on KSL/TV.
I recently bought a DVD player recorder thinking I was upgrading to new technology, at least that is what I told the wife. I really wanted something that I could up convert to 1080P and have a few more bells and whistles. Although I have been playing with the record function of the player and found that I need to buy a component cable if I want to use the TV's tuner to record the picture. Hind sight is I should have bought a unit that had a built in digital tuner as well, one that picks up HD. Anyway the up convert pictures are great. I will let you know how the recording does since it is also supposed to be able to record in HD as well. FYI this is not a Blue Ray, I haven't got that kind of scratch.
I am still looking for the satellite companies to offer a better package before I sign up again. I don't think I will be throwing out the antenna though since I get some channels not offered from any of the cable or satellite companies.. Imagine that! I just believe that if I am paying for the signal to be sent from whatever source then 100% of the programming should be in HDTV at the very least up converted. I know that is more bandwidth but I think I deserve more for my money than they are offering.
Labels: Digital Antenna TV, Digital TV, f02/17/09, Up convert